Dear Oscar®,
We realize that when it comes time to give out the nominations each
year, you have the memory of Leonard Shelby. Last year, all five Best
Picture nominees opened in December, and in the major categories,
(picture, directing, acting, writing) films that opened in the first
half of the year garnered only four nominations. Yes, we understand
that it's not completely your fault as studios hoard much of their
best product until late in the year, but it's a shame that so many
quality films and performances tend to be overlooked because of the
quirk of the release schedule. With Seabiscuit's being hailed as the
first Oscar contender of the year, the message seems to be that
everything released January through June doesn't count. On top of
that, with an accelerated awards season this year, it's going to be
even more difficult to think back to May or June, much less January or
February, so we're here to help. Here are some films, performances,
etc. from the first half of the year that we feel are worthy of your
consideration. File them away, and then dust them off come nomination
time. Sure there simply may be five better choices that come from
December releases, but we hope you can find some room for these early
birds on your select list of the best in films for the whole year. (Dan Krovich/BOP)
City of God
One of the good things about the fact that you decided to snub this
Brazilian film in the Best Foreign Film category last year is that it
is now eligible in other categories this year. I think you should
give it serious consideration for Best Picture. I mean you threw a
nomination at Gangs of New York last year, and City of God tackles a
very similar subject matter infinitely more successfully. City of God
is both intimate and epic. In a film that spans three decades, you
feel as if you get to know just about everyone in the large ensemble
cast as fully realized characters while Gangs of New York felt
populated by caricatures. Superlative storytelling is mixed with
stylistic, but not distracting filmmaking, which makes City of God an
outstanding candidate in categories across the board. But, hey, I'm
realistic and I know how hard it is for you to remember a Brazilian
film that opened in January, so I'm willing to make a deal. You've
shown that you're willing to throw a bone to a foreign film released
early in the year with a screenplay nomination (Y tu mamá también)
before, so let's say you at least give City of God an Adapted
Screenplay nomination, and we'll call it a compromise. (Dan Krovich/BOP)
Capturing the Friedmans
Your documentary branch has always been something of an oddball group.
Their selection process differs from the Academy at large, and their
choices have been at times frustrating. Last year, they broke the
trend of seemingly specifically shunning any documentary that had any
popular success by giving the award to the box office hit Bowling for
Columbine. (Though, having seen four of the five nominated docs,
Columbine ranks fourth in my book, but that's a different column
completely.) So the first thing we need to do is make sure that you
don't ignore Capturing the Friedmans in the Best Documentary category.
It seems like it should be a lock, but like I said, you've been a
little weird in that area before. But I wanted to talk to you about
more than that. Perhaps because Bowling for Columbine broke through,
documentaries have had a much greater success at the box office this
year than they're used to. How about helping to spur on this trend by
giving Capturing the Friedmans a Best Picture nomination? The film is
simply the best, most gripping mystery film I've seen in years. Now,
I know you might feel a little strange about giving a Best Picture
nomination to a film that technically doesn't even have a screenplay.
Well, that brings me to my other suggestion. While it's true that
documentaries often don't have screenplays as a framework, they are
sometimes stuck with literally over one hundred hours of footage to
mold into a story. So, the real art in telling the story often comes
in the editing. If you're not ready to go whole hog with Best
Picture, a Best Editing nomination would be a nice baby step towards
recognizing documentary films in general, and Capturing the Friedmans
in particular, as a legitimate and exemplary part of the overall film
landscape; not just something to be compartmentalized into two
categories in the middle of the ceremony. (Dan Krovich/BOP)
Willard
So the movie flopped, it's a genre film, and on top of that, your
members probably don't even know the movie exists much less have they
seen it, but I'd like to make a modest plea for Crispin Glover in the
Best Actor category? Some may think having Glover play a
weirdo-outcast who befriends an army of rats was simply an example of
an Actor playing himself, but Glover gave a humanizing performance
that isn't usually seen in movies about rats attacking people. He was
a big reason that Willard elevated itself above the usual genre fare.
Of course, the price paid was box office failure as horror fans didn't
want to see a drama mixed with dark comedy and the drama audience didn't want to see a movie about rats. I realize the chances of an actual nomination are non-existent here, but if you could at least keep
Glover on your medium list, I'd be much obliged. (Dan Krovich/BOP)
Finding Nemo
If there's such a thing as an Oscar® lock in July, Finding Nemo as
winner of the Best Animated Film is it. So let's talk about what else
you can do in other categories, and why not start at the top with Best
Picture? You have shown that you are willing to go the route of
recognizing an animated film this way when you nominated Beauty and
the Beast. Now, don't just think that because you have an animated
feature category, the animated films are taken care of and can be
ignored elsewhere. Again, like with Capturing the Friedmans and the
documentary category, a Best Picture nomination would help further
legitimize animated films as valuable to the entire spectrum of films.
If you don't have room there, there is always the screenplay. While
we're at it, though I admit I'm not sure about the rules on
eligibility of voice actors, how about Ellen DeGeneres in the
Supporting Actress category? Her portrayal of the sidekick character,
Dory, could have very easily been grating, but instead DeGeneres
reminded us how funny she can really be. In an outstanding film, her
performance stood out as the most memorable, which is a feat that
should be worthy of recognition. (Dan Krovich/BOP)
Whale Rider
Speaking of Leonard Shelby, Newmarket Film Group has proven that Memento
was not a one-hit wonder for them thanks to this little gem. While BOP
harbors no illusions about Whale Rider's chances at getting a best picture
nod, it would be criminal for the two leads to at least be added to the call
back list for Best Actress and Best Supporting Actor. It's not like we're
asking for or even expecting the nods. Instead, BOP is merely saying that
when the end-of-year vote buying campaign begins in earnest and you members
of the Academy have your mailboxes stuffed with freebies, don't be so quick
to throw this movie out sight unseen. If you just watch the film, BOP feels
confident Keisha Castle-Hughes as a pre-ordained leader and Rawiri Paratene's work
as a true believer stubbornly holding to the old ways will be memorable
enough to make your short list of 15 or so performances. One nomination we
do expect is in the Best Adapted Screenplay category. While last year saw a
strong set of five contenders, this is historically one of the thinnest categories
of the major contenders. In event of another off-year for adaptations, writer/director
Niki Caro's work in bringing Witi Ihimaera's vision to the big screen deserves strong
consideration not just for nomination but for victory in the category. (David Mumpower/BOP)
View other columns by Dan Krovich