By Dan Krovich
November 19, 2002
Based on the memoirs of author A.E. Hotchner, King of the Hill is a coming-of-age film set during the Great Depression in St. Louis, Missouri. Jesse
Bradford plays Aaron Kurlander, a twelve-year-old boy whose family, like
many others, has fallen on hard times. His father is out of work, and he is
so single-minded about landing that big job that he inadvertently neglects
the emotional needs of his family. The Kurlanders are living in a decrepit
hotel that is one step away from a Hooverville, while the hotel's owner is
simply waiting for tenants to default on rent so he can evict them to use
their rooms as part of his makeshift bordello.
Aaron escapes through his imagination. He makes up stories about his family
to tell the kids at school to hide the fact that he is the "poor kid" in the
class, and excels in school. His situation isn't great to begin with, but
then it gets worse. First, his younger brother is sent to live with
relatives, then his mother is sent to a sanitarium, and finally his father
must leave town to find work, eventually leaving Aaron to fend for himself.
While that sounds thoroughly depressing, the tone of the film is
surprisingly light. We see the film through Aaron's eyes, and though many
of these events get him down momentarily, he also sees them as a big
adventure.
Bradford is called on to carry the film, and he does so admirably. King of
the Hill could have easily been a sappy film about a plucky kid overcoming
hardship, but Bradford imbues Aaron with a perfect mix of innocence and
maturity. Though events call for a certain amount of sympathy, he never
allows it to devolve into pity. Aaron is irrepressible and he never comes
across as a victim, as he is constantly taking an active role in his life
while earning his independence and learning several hard facts about life.
Soderbergh films the period in bright colors, which further affects the
mood, making it seem more like a hyper real fairy tale than a gloomy film
about a downtrodden family. He succeeds in making the Great Depression look
like a fun time to live. The villains also take on a certain mythical
quality too, from the devious hotel bellhop to the big-bottomed police
officer. The result is that Soderbergh creates a wonderland full of
challenges for Aaron to navigate, and through his journeys our hero ascends
to a new level of maturity. There is a still a slight bittersweet quality
to the film, though, as on his way Aaron does experience and witness
hardship and also suffers a loss of innocence. This is driven home in
particular when he comes to the realization that he not only is no longer
dependent on his father, but that he may also be a better provider than his
father.
King of the Hill is truly a film to be treasured. It is the rare film that
tells the story of children without descending into schmaltzy
sentimentality. It honestly portrays the process of growing up,
particularly in the midst of hard times, providing a profound character arc
for its young lead. Full of deceptive simplicity, King of the Hill stands
out as perhaps Soderbergh's best film and deserves to be held up with his
more celebrated Cannes and Oscar winning films.
View other columns by Dan Krovich